Integrations / Architecture
Connect business records to shop-floor reality.
Define a path from approved ERP and execution records to a traceable operational answer. Access, mapping, and permissions determine the scope.
Choose authority for each field
Begin with the question the operation needs answered, then identify the records that can answer it. An ERP may hold the customer promise, production order, and purchasing records. A MES or another execution source may carry operation events. These are mapping candidates to validate in your deployment, rather than a universal split of responsibility.
Assign a source owner for order ID, due date, released quantity, operation completion, material availability, and update time. Where two records disagree, preserve both values and the rule used to resolve them. A cross-system answer becomes useful when the team can inspect that reasoning and identify who should confirm an unresolved field.
| Question | Candidate record | Mapping check |
|---|---|---|
| When is the job due? | Customer or production order | Customer promise versus internal target |
| What happened last? | Operation event | Event time, sequence, and reversals |
| Is material available? | Inventory and reservation | Usable stock for this job |
| Who should review? | Approved responsibility map | Role and escalation path |
A proposed source-to-answer architecture
The scope to evaluate is approved sources, record mapping, data checks, an answer or alert, and human review. Access may involve an available API, an approved database view, or an agreed export. The chosen route must be reviewed against the system version, licensing, network access, and the shop’s security requirements.
Validate identifiers before joining records. Include split orders, alternate routings, repeated operation numbers, and material units. Keep source references with each derived statement. A view that joins on a display name alone may attach the wrong record; an explicit mapping and representative test set are part of the proposed acceptance criteria.
Show what happens when a source is late
Preserve event time, source update time when available, and retrieval time. Set a freshness limit for the specific review. A daily planning answer and an operation dispatch decision need different expectations. If a source is unavailable, show the last successful retrieval and identify which part of the answer is uncertain.
Illustrative example: an ERP due date is current, but the operation feed has not refreshed since the previous shift. The job can retain its known due date while progress is marked unconfirmed. The reviewer should see the missing source, its age, and the person responsible for checking it. Stale execution data should not quietly turn into a safe-job conclusion.
Review write access after the read workflow
Define which roles may see which records, how access is granted, and how it is removed. Begin evaluation with the minimum read permissions for the selected question. A proposed alert must use an approved destination and disclose only the records its recipients may access.
For any write action, specify the target fields, approver, conditions, and record of the decision. Confirm that a changed source record invalidates an old proposal. Review the actual deployment before defining the connection. The SAP Business One, Odoo, and MES assessments explain the version, access, and mapping questions to bring.
Start with one operational question.
Tell us what your team keeps looking up. We will talk through the workflow and the systems behind it.
Book a 15-minute call